Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 4,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
Personal Liability for Patent Infringement: A plain reading of the patent laws make clear that individuals can be held liable for patent infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(a) ("whoever without authority makes … any patented invention, within the United States … infringes the patent"). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 695 (1978) (“The fact that engineers are often involved in large-scale projects significantly affecting the public safety does not alter our analysis. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Yücel is a citizen of Sweden . . ., and was extradited from the Republic of Moldova to the United States in May 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
United States, 490 U. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 10:28 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:35 am
World Restoration, and a more recent WCAB panel opinion in Weilmann v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
District Judge Denny Chin has ruled in Stern v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:27 am
The report is billed as a "comprehensive" review of the voting systems used in Ohio, which are also used throughout the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
That explains why United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:12 pm
Justice Edwards in 410263 B.C. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:12 pm
Justice Edwards in 410263 B.C. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am
Schedule 6 contains modifications to be made to the GDPR articles (e.g., by changing references to member states to refer to the United Kingdom) so that they will continue to apply after Brexit. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
