Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
McQuigg is now the fifth to reach the Court on the controversy after a wave of lower court rulings — striking down state bans in almost all of the cases so far — that had followed the Supreme Court’s decision fourteen months ago in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Future historians may credit the nomination and, if confirmed, the first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court, to President Joe Biden for fulfilling a campaign promise. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no immediate impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Together, Whole Foods and Wild Oats operated 300 of the approximately 34,000 supermarkets in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:14 pm
See State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
In Summum v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
It is to be assumed that socialist core values are not static but, they evolve accordingly to the concrete needs of economic development. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
United States, 115 Wn.2d 52, 793 P.2d 969, 800 P.2d 1124 (1990). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
United States, 115 Wn.2d 52, 793 P.2d 969, 800 P.2d 1124 (1990). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
Nev. 2013) (granting a TRO to prevent trade secret misappropriation). [6] See, e.g., Core Labs v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
A decision by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:59 am
In Reichle v. [read post]
