Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 2081 - 2100 of 40,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 11:39 am by Michelle Velasquez
While in my final semester of law school, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Padilla v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 859, 120 S. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
" See United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
She stated that he does not respect their daughters’ privacy and will enter the bathroom when they are taking a shower. . . . [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:05 am by Thomas Dillickrath and Molly Lorenzi
On March 10, 2020, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona issued a tentative ruling denying Axon Enterprise’s motion for preliminary injunction and dismissing its complaint against the Federal Trade Commission, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
.' This appeal presents the question of whether this restriction is race-based and violates the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The standards for libel differ whether you are in Canada or the United States, so should one or the other decide to sue for libel, it would make a difference where they filed the lawsuit. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently held that a foreign manufacturer that places a product into the stream of commerce in the United States does not automatically subject itself to jurisdiction in each of the states where the product might foreseeably end up. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff Earlier this week, the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) held that the United States District Court for the District of Delaware clearly erred in its obviousness analysis in Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]