Search for: "United States v. King"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 3,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Federal and State Military Forces of TodayThe United States Armed ForcesThe National GuardState Defense ForcesThe Unorganized Militia Chapter 5The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum Periods A. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
Accordingly, we need not address any issues regarding the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.] [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:56 am
” The case is US ex. rel Lisitza v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:52 am
Second, an more importantly, the SJC suggested that it would not follow the United States Supreme Court decision of Kentucky v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm
In a recent case, however, it was a federal magistrate judge who was the weak link, failing failed to ensure sufficient protection for the free speech rights of foreign nationals who used United States Service providers for their commentary. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
A prior Supreme Court case dealing with the interplay between section 109 and 602(a)(1) (Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
Ultimately, however, the court relied on dicta from the U/S/ Supreme Court in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit joined the Ninth Circuit in holding Aug. 15 that an importer of a copyrighted work manufactured overseas for resale in the United States cannot use the first sale doctrine as a defense to infringement (John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
" Id. at 11 (citing Quality King Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:47 am
Specifically, in Quality King, the copyrighted works had been manufactured in the United States, sold to foreign distributors where they had been purchased by the defendant and then re-imported into the U.S. for re-sale. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
(The United States Supreme Court has the same problem.) [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
[and,][t]o the contrary, the textbooks introduced as evidence purport, on their face, to have been published outside of the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm
Wiley, of course, interpreted "lawfully made under this title" to mean "lawfully made in the United States". [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
United States, 367 U. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:01 am
King, 27 M.J. 327 (C.M.A. 1989) and United States v. [read post]
