Search for: "United States v. Robert"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 9,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:39 am
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
“It would be made upon the government of the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
However, I am still somehow unconvinced by divorcing licences from the issue of contracts (at least in the United States). [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
And, as Devillier's counsel Robert McNamara noted, "the rogue state example is not a hypothetical. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Thanks to Robert Dittmer for the pointer. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 2:04 pm
(The application was 07A546; the case, while continuing in District Court, is also pending on appeal to the Supreme Court — Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
The slippery slope for the United States Supreme Court began in 2000 with the decision in Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:17 am
Plaintiff alleges that in May of 2009, Defendants published a book entitled “Conan the Barbarian” in the United Kingdom, which book is now also available in the United States. [read post]
