Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 66,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
Harrison v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm
” Then, discussing the venerable case of Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
While the United States Supreme Court is cranking out a plethora of 5-4 decisions, with a very well-defined liberal and conservative group (and Justice Kennedy as the swing), the California Supreme Court's decisions are often the exact opposite. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:58 pm
Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:56 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:49 am
The case, Timbs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter on the thread about the 1901 case in which the court rejected (on statutory grounds) a prosecution for expelling someone from church based on how he voted writes: It goes almost without saying that religious freedom was not at issue in this case because the First Amendment would not be incorporated against the states until Gitlow v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:21 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Gallardo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
Today’s clippings include further commentary on the Court’s decision in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
In Elrod v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In Parents for Educational and Religious Liberty in Schools v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
Plaintiff files a state court lawsuit through counsel, plaintiff and his attorney decide to file two other duplicative actions in federal court as well "to be safe", and then plaintiff and his attorney decide to dismiss the state suit and one of the federal actions and go forward with the third, and attorney does so. [read post]
