Search for: "Wright v. Wright" Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Open Rights Group has a post by Jim Killock, “Jeremy Wright needs to act to avert disasters from porn age checks”. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Logan, 650 So. 2d 653, 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (“there remain disputed issues of fact concerning whether Lowry is an [sic] covered employee or an independent contractor and whether he was injured in the course and scope of his employment”); Wright v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:52 pm
Nonetheless, Klein and Wright provide evidence that slotting frequently occurs with incumbent products. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:23 pm by Josh Wright
  There is good economic reason for manufacturers to pay retailers for premium shelf space (see Klein and Wright, 2007); and evidence that these arrangements are good for consumers (Wright, 2008). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 2 July 2024, there will be hearings in Craig Wright v Peter McCormack QB-2019-001430 and Organista v Rodrigues QB-2021-003806 On Wednesday 3 July 2024, there will be a hearing in the defamation case of Aslani v Sobierajska QB-2020-004166. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 1329 that test had been held to be the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]