Search for: "BAKER V. STATE"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 3,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Although a demand for retroactivity of wages and benefits is generally a mandatory subject of negotiations under the Act and arbitrable under §204.9(g) of the Act, the Association asserted that the joint employer’s proposal was prohibited based upon the rationale in the Appellate Division, Third Department’s decision in Baker v Board of Education, Hoosick Falls Central School District, 3 AD3d 678, 37 PERB ¶7502 (3d Dept 2004). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
J.M.B., 650 A.2d 757 (N.J. 1994); State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:33 am
In Michael Baker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:41 pm
Baker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:41 pm
Baker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
Baker and Atlantic Sounding v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
State. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
State. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
The amicus group say the State Board of Workers' Compensation had construed this language more liberally, and that the court "should have given them deference. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
(cloth, $24.95, ebook).Baker, H. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
Baker III, Marshawn Evans, and Richard North Patterson are just a few of the highlights of this year's State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting June 14–15 in Houston at the George R. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
Baker III, Marshawn Evans, and Richard North Patterson are just a few of the highlights of this year's State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting June 14–15 in Houston at the George R. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm
Delving into the case law, the court noted that the venerable case of Baker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:52 am
In Cuevas v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:12 am
The panel was careful to say that its decision did not invalidate state marriage laws excluding same-sex couples because, in part, only the Supreme Court could do so under its own precedent in Baker v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am
In a unanimous three-judge panel ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) O’Connell v Viridian Housing [2012] EWHC 1389 (QB) (25 May 2012) Lewis v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Ors [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB) (25 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v The Football League Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1372 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Shanmuganathan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
