Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 5,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 9:46 am
New York Appellate Division, Third Department: Yonaty v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm
These are Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 and Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner & Webber [2018] UKUT 410. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:27 am
Whitney v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
The CAT stressed that continuous trading was not essential and could be, as Arden LJ later put it in the Court of Appeal, “paused”; Identify the assets that GET obtained over and above the bare assets; Ask whether these acquisitions placed GET in a different position from that in which it would have been if it had purchased them in the open market; and If GET used those assets in the same way in which they were previously used by SeaFrance, that did not, in and of itself, mean… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Keenan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:12 am
Wade and its 2000 decision in Stenberg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:26 am
It relied on Spokeo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:21 am
In Muccio v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:46 am
Earlier this Term, in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:06 pm
I blew in town for barely 24 hours to talk about the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) and the recently-decided Robinson, v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm
Cain and last session's ruling in Connick v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:05 am
See Roby v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm
On its bare language, I would think the ordinance is content based, but this is not an unreasonable application of the Pap's precedent. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 4:35 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:33 pm
See Lynas v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:26 am
The expensing provisions allowed corporations tax breaks for equipment they would have bought anyway, but didn't create new jobs--the Bush regime's jobs record was terrible, barely keeping up with inflation and certainly not spurring new job growth. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am
In Schuette v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 7:49 am
Privacy * Vigil v. [read post]
