Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 2101 - 2120 of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
The order doesn't explain its reasoning in detail but states, in relevant part, [T]he Los Angeles Times ... [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:07 am by Sean Murphy
The merits of this issue were not resolved by the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Goldwater v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am by admin
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am by Pamela S. Karlan
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]