Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 44,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 1:29 pm
Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
After all, Apple—also larger than Google—has about 57% market share of mobile-phone sales in the United States, and about a 55% share of tablet sales. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California just denied in part--and in economic terms, almost completely--a U.S. antitrust class action brought on behalf of leading French publishers such as Le Figaro and L'Équipe (about that one, see my personal note toward the end). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm
Following the statutory requirement to establish a “legitimate busiess interest” to enforce a non-compete agreement, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Autonation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:54 pm
United States, 161 Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm
United States, 492 F.3d 1308 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am
”Lea V., law professor emerita “I’m very grateful to Cornell LII and its tireless staff for providing free and up-to-date access to the United States Code and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence, plus its US Supreme Court advance sheets provided under its Hermes Project. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
In Virden v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:23 am
Aug. 1, 2023) (Africk). [2] Citing the Fontenot v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
” However, entry to the United States under that statute is limited to two years. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
The Court’s analysis was guided by cases such as Goleta Union School District v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:33 am
But at that moment, Judge Chutkan had no idea that United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
