Search for: "Downs v State" Results 2101 - 2120 of 40,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Heather Dadashi
That’s what’s at stake in a case called Patz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
” But its attempts to play down the significance of the case are undercut by the fact that the government thought the issue was important enough to petition for en banc review. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Secondly, this regulation has received new scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in NYSRPA v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am by Christine Corcos
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:21 am by SHG
Tim Cushing does an excellent job of saying what needed to be said about the Third Circuit’s decision in Fenico v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Even if the FTC’s proposal is struck down by legal challenges, state laws that narrow the scope and/or application of allowable noncompetes will remain. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm by Josh Blackman
[Believe it or not, Justice Kennedy's final opinion toned down some of the "awkward language. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:14 am by Unknown
Yesterday the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Sanders v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
George (McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University; Nootbaar Honorary Distinguished Professor of Law, Pepperdine Caruso Law School; Google Scholar): After the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]