Search for: "FISH v. STATE"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 3,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 10:33 am
Streamlining Tuna with Cloves, in both cases we now have: (1) a finding of discrimination (cloves v. menthols in Cloves; stricter labeling requirements in the ETP v. outside the ETP in Tuna) and (2) a finding that the ban on cloves / strict labeling requirements in the ETP are not more trade restrictive than necessary. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
See Baxter v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 7:45 am
Lawsuit Alleges Cannabis Church Raid Unlawful One cannabis church leader in Humbolt County is suing the state’s Department of Fish and Wildlife for allegedly violating the rights of the church when it raided the property last year and destroyed an uncounted number of cannabis plants located in five greenhouses. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:42 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:41 pm
First, Arizona Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
The Defendant cites two state court cases, McMillen v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
QIP Holders; in that post, I point to other precedent expressly using 230 to shut down discovery fishing expeditions. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
Opinion in CBD v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:43 am
Galindo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In Tompkins v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sebelius v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:38 am
No more crush videos: President Barack Obama on Thursday signed into law a bill that outlaws the creation and distribution of so-called animal crush videos -- culminating a remarkably quick response to a Supreme Court decision handed down less than eight months ago.It was April 20 when the Court, in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:08 am
In Patten et al. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 2:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:56 pm
The opinion, State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:10 am
Maryland courts are, as we learned again in Falik v. [read post]
