Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 15,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
Whilst it had been submitted by opposing counsel that Wenman may have exaggerated this figure, HHJ Clarke went so far as to suggest that even if only 5% or 1% of her work was attributable to Archangel Alchemy (though HHJ Clarke considered on the evidence that it was more than that), this would be more than trivial and would have generated sufficient actual goodwill to be capable of damage by reason of a misrepresentation.HHJ Clarke dismissed claims that ‘The Archangel Alchemist’… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:07 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Babcock v Kijakazi displayed a bench still uncertain about how to resolve a problem about the Social Security benefits available to a small group of National Guard workers. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 3:41 am
For instance, an email titled “Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court case Murray v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 11:03 am
Grant v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
UPDATE Ministerial Review Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
UPDATE Ministerial Review Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:59 pm
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
Northwestern University, 953 F.3d 980 (7th Cir. 2020), cert. granted sub nom., Hughes v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
Key Findings A typical American household with four cell phones on a “family share” plan, paying $100 per month for taxable wireless service, would pay nearly $300 per year in taxes, fees, and government surcharges—up from $270 in 2020. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Another version of the decision, Rex v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
They were fully able to make observations about whether the FTT had gone wrong in awarding them too high a figure. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:38 am
While brand harm may be what is motivating Southwest’s actions, that argument has not figured prominently in the proceedings. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
” At this point, one can imagine all involved returning to the figurative table. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Contrairement à la loi ontarienne (Loi sur les jurys) appliquée dans R. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Rose v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
– United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
.'"From "Superstitious Understanding" (Etymonline).Standing over expressed dominance, but superstition seems more like something outside of you is looming over you and intimidating you, so it's hard to... understand... how the concrete idea of standing figures into this meaning. [read post]
