Search for: "German v. German" Results 2101 - 2120 of 5,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am by Beth Van Schaack
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:49 am by Stacey Lantagne
I started reading this case out of the Northern District of Alabama, ProctorU, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
This is a live blog of the first day of the hearing of the appeal brought by the Scotch Whisky Association and others, concerning the lawfulness of the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The German parliament has passed a bill that awards extensive surveillance powers to law enforcement authorities. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
The court ruled that Isentress fulfilled the requirement of public interest as prescribed in the German Patent Act. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
The most important book ever written on presidential impeachment is only 69 pages long. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
 This GuestKat has noted with interest comments which suggest that this case opens the way to a doctrine of "file wrapper estoppel" in the UK, but wonders whether the case really goes much further than existing UK case law which has admitted reference to the file in cases of "admissions against interest" - see for example Rohm & Haas v Collag [2002] F.S.R. 28  and  Furr v Truline [1985] F.S.R. 553. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:49 am by Daily Record Staff
… On June 25, 2015, Bond filed a Complaint for Employment Discrimination against General German Aged Home of Baltimore, d/b/a Edenwald (“Edenwald”) in ... [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:17 am
Said French President Emmanuel Macron, quoted in a NYT article about a Holocaust remembrance event, which took place at the Vélodrome d’Hiver, where 75 years ago, "France... organized" the roundup of 13,000 Jews, by the French, and "not a single German. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The Court dismisses Actavis' cross-appeal on the basis that if its products did not directly infringe, they would indirectly infringe to the extent held by the Court of Appeal.And, of course, the weekly updates Monday Miscellany and Sunday Surprises.Photo credit: rawdonfoxPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent Drawing Rules I German Supreme Court holds that extra-territorial delivery can result in patent infringement I… [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Who bears the evidential burden and the standard required for the burden to be discharged are germane questions. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Brian Cordery
Further reasons for this approach were that it was held to be consistent with the approach of the German, Italian and Dutch Courts and that it would apply to variants that rely on, or are based on, developments which occur after the priority date. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Brian Cordery
Further reasons for this approach were that it was held to be consistent with the approach of the German, Italian and Dutch Courts and that it would apply to variants that rely on, or are based on, developments which occur after the priority date. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Stark Reed Readers undoubtedly are aware of the recent outbreak of ransomware incidents and the problems they present. [read post]