Search for: "Goldman v Goldman" Results 2101 - 2120 of 2,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 11:13 am by Lawrence Cunningham
The same is true for the kind of deal at issue in SEC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Goldman may try to prove that Paulson played no significant role in the actual selection, having merely made suggestions or provided advise on the issue. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:09 am by Venkat
  I blogged about this at Professor Goldman's Technology and Marketing Law blog: First, a plaintiff took a spam case to trial and was awarded damages:  "Plaintiff Wins $7000 Following Bench Trial on Claims Under California Anti-Spam Statute -- Balsam v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:22 am by Ashby Jones
“If it pans out, it’s a severe blow to Goldman and its reputation. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
By now, everyone not otherwise comatose has heard about the case brought by the SEC against Goldman Sachs. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:11 pm by Adam Levitin
So far no one seems to be talking about the end-game of the SEC suit against Goldman Sachs over the Abacus CDO. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:34 am by Erik Gerding
The allegations are that a large hedge fund, Paulson & Co., pushed Goldman to sell a CDO to investors. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hosted by Graeme Dinwoodie (DePaul/Oxford) & Mark Janis (Indiana) Session 1: Permissible Uses of Marks: Rationales and Sources of Law. [read post]