Search for: "Google, Inc" Results 2101 - 2120 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Here, for instance, is a letter that led the court in Correctional Medical Care, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Also, consider whether the plaintiff’s name in relation to the defamation appears on a Google search beyond the first couple of pages of a search result. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:29 am by Jani Ihalainen
In Germany and Spain, right after the adoption of the regulation, Google Inc. stopped its local Google News tool. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 3:25 am by Barry Sookman
Google, 2015 BCCA 265 in affirming the de-indexing order made by Chambers judge Fenlon in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
Recently, the FTC filed its “Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Pre-Trial Brief and Exhibits” in the Matter of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
” The agreements at issue in this lawsuit, Champion et al. v. 1-800 Contacts Inc., relate to keyword advertising, which is when companies purchase words or phrases (keywords) that trigger the display of an advertisement when entered into a search engine like Google or Bing. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Raskopf, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New YorkDavid Rosenberg, Vice President, IP Policy, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), LondonLaura Sheridan, Senior Patent Counsel, Google, New YorkJule Sigall, Assistant General Counsel – IP Policy & Strategy, Intellectual Property Group, Corporate, External & Legal Affairs, Microsoft Corporation, RedmondBradley Silver, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Time Warner Inc., New YorkBrad Smith, President and Chief Legal… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:13 pm by Mary Minow
TVEYES, Inc), and the ability to parody a popular movie (Point Break). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:13 pm by Mary Minow
TVEYES, Inc), and the ability to parody a popular movie (Point Break). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:13 pm by Mary Minow
TVEYES, Inc), and the ability to parody a popular movie (Point Break). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 11:50 pm by Thomas Long
” The court rejected Google’s contention that its cited prior art taught a “central broadcast server” even under the Board’s construction (Google Inc. v. [read post]