Search for: "Held v. State" Results 2101 - 2120 of 82,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2020, 2:45 pm
(Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, January 21, 2020, Techno Lite, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 5:38 am by B.W. Barnett
"In this case, however, the Appellant did not seek to prove that he would not have been convicted of some degree of homicide - he only sought to disprove the State's theory of capital murder. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Pacific Health Corp., 202 Cal.App.4th 1034 (2012)] and its adoption as a matter of California law of the United States Supreme Court’s analysis in Smith v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
The courts were not able to come to a final decision on this point, however, the Supreme Court held that size, permanence and degree of annexation (the criteria established in Skerritts of Nottingham Limited v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (No 2) [2000] EWCA Civ 556) were relevant in determining whether an item falls under the statutory definition of ‘building’. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
But because a “trial court is not bound by the nomenclature used by a party […], the trial court could treat [a motion to suppress] as a motion in limine” State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Doe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Doe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing People v Knickerbocker Ice Co., 99 NY 181, the Appellate Division said "[it] has always been the province of the court to declare what the law is. [read post]