Search for: "High v State"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 35,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
We understand that the Judiciary is the third power of the State, which allows a system of checks and balances, however, if we have a Legislative Power that disqualifies without truthful grounds and only for personal trials, can we maintain that balance of powers? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Several things seem conspicuous, besides Geldon’s Everest-high dudgeon about the imperfect realization of a presumed conspiracy. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:18 am
The case arises from a guy who was stalking a female musician online.The case is Counterman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Specifically, it indicated that 10,000 decisions (page 5) were rendered, “in a timely manner,” (though the reader may note this is not a particularly high number of decisions given the court states it is comprised of over 300 Federally appointed Judges, meaning each is churning out a decision or so every couple of weeks). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:50 am
As my colleagues at Morrison Foerster note in this alert, in Mallory v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
DCAA’s Organization DCAA’s organizational structure consists of a Headquarters, four Corporate Audit Directorates (CADs) organized by major contractors, three geographical regions (Eastern, Central and Western) for other contractors, and a Field Detachment that focuses on classified work.[14] Overall, DCAA has approximately 230 offices located throughout the United States, Europe, and the Middle East.[15] DCAA’s Headquarters is located at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.[16]… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
Proactive obligations of this kind raise serious questions about a state’s compliance with human rights law, due to the high risk that in their efforts to determine whether user content is legal or illegal, platforms will end up taking down users’ legitimate speech at scale. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
Tanner Allread On June 15, Indian Country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Haaland v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
” Doe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:59 am
In Parks v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am
The High Court held that the PSED did have extraterritorial effect. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
Youth and Excessive Force Analysis The Supreme Court of the United States established, in Graham v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
ISL posits that this provision grants the power to draw districts to state legislatures--independent of state high court review. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
University of Texas, discussed a race-neutral admissions method that was enacted by the Texas legislature: the top ten per cent of students in every high school in the state were automatically guaranteed admission to any of the state’s public colleges or universities.... [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
The Glendoe Scheme is a state-of-the-art facility first opened by HM The Queen in 2009 and the only large-scale hydro-electric station of its type built in the UK in the last 50 years. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
