Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
By Dennis Crouch Nordock v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:56 pm
United States, and McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
United States Weyrauch v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
Quinta posted the OLC Memorandum assessing the legality of the refugee ban, and the memorandum from White House counsel to the State Department on the status of green card holders. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 1:33 am
Take IP Bridge v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Illinois Brick could have been overruled in Apple v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:59 am
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:23 pm
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Por: Víctor Manuel Guízar López INTERNET HAS BECOME A TOOL THAT HAS UNIMAGINABLY REDESIGNED THE MEANS BY WHICH HUMAN BEINGS COMMUNICATE AND HAS TURNED OUT TO BE THE PURE EMBODIMENT OF GLOBALIZATION. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
The WIPO study indicates, for example, that in the case of Mexico, these industries contribute 11.01 per cent, in the United States 8.49 per cent, and in Canada 5.5 per cent. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 10:47 am
United States Business & Indus. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:15 am
Rather, it says that the State Department should only list “Israel” as a birthplace if the passport-holder so requests. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
A denial of a visa is a final decision that for the foreseeable future will preclude a noncitizen’s admission to the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
”13 Viacom v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
” The dental permits expire one year after the issuance date or whenever the permit holder is no longer associated with the Mobile Dental Facility or Portable Dental Unit, whichever is sooner. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:48 pm
Toxics Coal. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997.… [read post]
