Search for: "Holiday v. State"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
After the holiday, Brentwood served enforcement notices and then issued the application for an injunction. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
Need Halloween Legal Help (Greenport) [Jerks in your Area] Earlier: It's Come to This: Unpaid Internships For Lawyers With One - Three Years Experience Sponsored Topics: Halloween - Holidays - Haunted Attractions - Commercial Attractions - United States [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 3:35 pm
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:38 am
That's at least part of the lesson from the North Carolina Court of Appeals last week in Commercial Credit Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
State was upheld. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
” HA-LO Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 1:45 pm
In Van Wyhe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
’” Boucher v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:52 pm
’” Boucher v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
The court held that the advance notice rule to apply for special holiday observances was permissible and that that there was no discriminatory intent involved in rejecting plaintiff's application as late.In Willard v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:44 am
Since the Brussels I Regulation (Council Regulation 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters) permitted an individual to bring a direct action against the insurer in the member state of his domicile, it followed that the insurer must submit to the procedural rules of the member state in which it was sued. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
Larrikin alleges that Men at Work’s Down Under (you know, unfurl the Boxing Kangaroo, declare a national holiday and have a beer with Bondy) infringes the copyright in “Kookaburra”. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held on July 27, 2009 in Boucher v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:15 pm
Via the ever-vigilant Hugo Cox and the UK's IPO website comes news of an interesting reference to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) in Case C-168/09 Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa & Famiglia SpA. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:23 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DA (Colombia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 682 (13 July 2009) Bourne Leisure Ltd (t/a British Holidays) v Marsden [2009] EWCA Civ 671 (13 July 2009) Highland Crusader Offshore Partners LP & Ors v Deutsche Bank AG & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 725 (13 July 2009) Court of [...] [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:51 am
by Deepak Gupta Just before the holiday weekend, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued an opinion in Feeney v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
In a joint opinion, the committees state that accepting legal fees from such a company, or dividing with the company a fee paid by a homeowner, constitutes impermissible fee-sharing, and an attorney who engages in such a practice "imperils his or her license to practice law. [read post]
