Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Box 198 Hebron, CT 06248 Phone: (860) 228-9496; (800) 832-4409 (Toll Free in CT) E-mail: sharonN@eastersealsofct.org Easter Seals Child Development Center 125 Broad Street Meriden, CT 06450 Phone: (203) 686-1438 E-mail: karencdc@snet.net Easter Seals Mobility Center 158 State Street Meriden, CT 06450 Phone: (203) 237-7835 E-mail: DanielleD@eastersealsofct.org Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center of Southeastern Connecticut, Inc. 152-Norwich-New London Turnpike Uncasville, CT 06382… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
On remand, the State advanced various arguments in an effort to show that Amendment 2 was narrowly tailored to serve compelling interests, but the trial court found none sufficient. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
And for diplomacy to work, I'd imagine every country needs to be approached from a different angle. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Box 14700 Baton Rouge, LA 70898 Phone: (504) 488-0909 Barbara Duchardt, Associate Professor of Special Education Northwestern State University Teacher Education Center, Room 103-A, Pod D Natchitoches, LA 71497 Phone: (318) 357-5154 E-mail: duchardt@nsula.edu Mental Health Mental Health Association in Louisiana 263 Third Street, Suite 103 Baton Rouge, LA 70801 Phone: (225) 343-1921 E-mail: MHAL015@aol.com Web: http://www.mhal.org NAMI Louisiana 11762 South Harrell's Ferry Road,… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:33 pm
You’d think it’s normally not too difficult to prove that someone is your child or sibling, and you’d be correct, since usually USCIS only asks to see birth certificates (except for marriage cases because of the prevalence of fraud). [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:33 pm
You’d think it’s normally not too difficult to prove that someone is your child or sibling, and you’d be correct, since usually USCIS only asks to see birth certificates (except for marriage cases because of the prevalence of fraud). [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:27 am
As some of the ill children attend school only on Tuesdays and Thursdays, events that occurred on Tuesday, October 6 and Thursday, October 8, were of particular interest. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:46 pm
We’d love to hear from the audience. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
The Government had argued that Section 1346 should criminalize schemes involving fiduciaries’ undisclosed conflicts of interest, defined as “the taking of official action by [a public official or private] employee that furthers his own undisclosed financial interests while purporting to act in the interests of those to whom he owes a financial duty. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I am an only child, and he has become one of my de facto brothers over the years. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Grape, No. 07-3682 District Court order allowing the Government to forcibly medicate defendant, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1291, is affirmed where the Government has presented sufficiently important interests to forcibly medicate defendant, an incarcerated paranoid schizophrenic charged with child sex offenses. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
Stay tuned for more in-depth analyses of the proposed bills of most interest to employers as the session continues. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
Instead, they allowed the Bible Believers to proceed until the threat of “violent retaliation and physical injury” became too great, at which point they “discharge[d] their duty of preserving the peace by … by removing the speaker[s] for [their] own protection. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
Instead, they allowed the Bible Believers to proceed until the threat of “violent retaliation and physical injury” became too great, at which point they “discharge[d] their duty of preserving the peace by … by removing the speaker[s] for [their] own protection. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:49 am
-Austin 2008, pet. ref’d). [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
§ 68-33-103(b)(1)(A). [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
Accordingly, in the absence of a constitutional challenge, the rules clearly stated in the Code of Civil Procedure are what apply. [21] In Lac d’Amiante, the Court noted that in Quebec, “[t]he fundamental law concerning civil procedure is the law enacted by the National Assembly . [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:29 am
One cannot but approve the ruling of the French Cour de Cassation confirming the decision of the Cour d’Appel of Rennes. [read post]
