Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 2101 - 2120
of 62,910
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 8:35 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:47 am
What about the fact we’re dealing with only 4 “counts”? [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Union opposed the Employer's motion.Noting that arbitration is highly favored in New York, Supreme Court, citing Falzone v NY Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 15 NY3d 530 and Goldfinger v Lisker, 68 NY2d 225, said although "courts seldomly disturb arbitration awards even if the courts would have reached a different conclusion ... [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Union opposed the Employer's motion.Noting that arbitration is highly favored in New York, Supreme Court, citing Falzone v NY Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 15 NY3d 530 and Goldfinger v Lisker, 68 NY2d 225, said although "courts seldomly disturb arbitration awards even if the courts would have reached a different conclusion ... [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:47 am
" Adamson Systems Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court acknowledged in the landmark case Gideon v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Uddin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Zepeda v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:47 pm
El zeitgeist. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
For the moment, the vision is one of constant and granular application of fairness balancing between traditional conceptions of male-female categorization n sport and other social relations (eg marriage, military service, clothing rules, etc.) and emerging re-imagining of sex and gender in social relations and in the constitution of the individual. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
While we’re on the topic (obscure agency history for $500, Alex), the FCC’s recent notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on “Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet” calls to mind some work that FTC colleagues and I did just a little. . . wait . . . a while ago, back in 2006-7. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
But in Palmore v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 7:54 pm
This week, during the US v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 2:58 pm
Parke v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By: Rachel V. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
And in Holder v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
These do not rise to the level of ‘disclaimer’ but we’re never entirely sure whether the specification-forward approach of Phillips v. [read post]