Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 2101 - 2120 of 10,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Unknown
The regulation’s definition of “qualified eligible persons” includes a portfolio requirement with a securities portfolio test threshold at $2 million and an initial margin and premium test threshold set at $200,000.Increased portfolio requirement. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WSLL
2) Does substantial evidence support those findings? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm by Employment Lawyers
 here are the most common situations where someone who voluntarily quits his/her job qualifies for Unemployment Compensation Benefits:1)  A substantial reduction in rate of pay (THINK: >20%);2)  A significant change in work hours. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:57 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark ARKIVE for document and data services, finding the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:16 am
If the victim does not fall quickly enough for this fake “federal student tax”, the scammer threatens to report the student to the police. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
Moreover, the defendant asserts that the allegation that the child suffered "substantial pain" is uncorroborated hearsay and does not indicate that the child was injured as a result of his actions. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:54 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 On October 16, UIC John Marshall Law School is organizing its International IP Practice Seminar. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by John Jascob
By John Filar AtwoodThe SEC has approved the NYSE’s proposed change to its listing rules that will allow companies that have not completed an underwritten IPO to be traded on the exchange. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm by Will Baude
The plaintiff actually went to trial and won $62,650 for his mistreatment in prison before the verdict was overturned, 2-1, by an appeals panel on the ground that qualified immunity protected the defendants from liability for their unconstitutional conduct. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 5:52 am
" Of course, the fact that applicant may be the first and only user does not immunize the mark from being merely descriptive of the services.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: So on its face the mark may seem incongruous, but when you drill down to the actual services, maybe not.Text Copyright John L. [read post]