Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 2101 - 2120 of 21,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
This usually refers to the dog owner’s tort liability: When a dog bit someone, the dog’s owner was generally liable if he “knew about the dog’s vicious propensities” — until the first bite, the owner could (usually) argue that he didn’t know about those propensities, but that first bite would (usually) put him on notice. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 11:22 am
Although the jury found the defendants not liable in Freeman’s fatal Boston fall accident, Judge Elizabeth Fahey ordered the bar and its owners to pay $6.7M in damages. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:52 am by Ben Vernia
Under the standards governing successor liability, Defendant cannot be held liable for those activities as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:07 pm by John C. Manoog III
Weaver Scope Of Strict Liability Under § 51 The defendants motion to dismiss is based upon the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts’ holding in McAllister v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court denied Bachmann's motion for summary judgment, citing Second Circuit authority that holds that public supervisors can be liable for their gross negligence in supervising subordinates. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:16 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
The defendants insurance policy limit had been $5 million, and plaintiffs initially only demanded $12.5 million. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
Ultimately, the jury determined the defendant was 80% liable for the accident and awarded the plaintiffs $4.7 million in damages. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The issue in this case is whether defendants are liable for violation of Section 722-b of the Penal Law of the State of New York. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
The farm owner then demanded his insurer, Georgia Farm Bureau, defend the lawsuit and pay any damage award under his policy. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
[I]f defendant lacked the specific intent to commit the theft but instead intended only to assist in hindering Davis's apprehension, defendant would be guilty only of the crime of hindering. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm by emagraken
Fineblit) the Plaintiff was involved in a collision that the Defendant was found fully liable for. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
A state court has found that the plaintiff’s claim that a home health caregiver and agency may be liable for the caregiver’s negligence in supervising a patient but it did not amount to a medical negligence case. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:12 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” The trial court’s grant of summary judgment for both defendants was affirmed. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Dean Freeman
Although old English common law established the idea of governmental “sovereign immunity” from torts, F.S. 768.28 outlines the state’s waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions, allowing it to be treated just like any other negligent party or vicariously liable employer. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by John M. O'Connor
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
As a result, the trial court properly admitted the evidence for the jury’s consideration, and the jury’s verdict was upheld. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:26 pm by Narendra Ghosh
 Because plaintiff’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment with both employer-defendants, they are jointly liable for his compensable injury. [read post]