Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 2101 - 2120 of 5,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An order dated August 14, 2014, in the New York County action granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing that complaint, without prejudice, on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 6:20 am by Neil Wilkof
If there is a place in the world to come for iconic copyright disputes, then surely the 1990’s Israeli case of Kimron v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
  One might justify what the Court did in Marschalk as stemming from the same pressures that led to the quick and decisive resolution of the Iranian claims isssue that prompted Dames & Moore itself, but in the typical case, a "GVR" in light of the new decision seems right on.Same, too, with the most recent well-known effort by a court of appeals to have the Supreme Court answer a certified question -- the en banc Second Circuit's 2005 certificate… [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 1:45 pm by mdkeenan
Prosecution is barred by double jeopardy. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm by cdw
Other cases of note includes yet another grant of relief in Arizona on aggravating factor (F)(6) (heinousness, cruelty, and depravity) in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:01 am
The employer then denied benefits entirely during a light duty release to return to work arguing that the safety rule violation termination barred the right to temporary disability benefits altogether. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
It also paid for sound and light equipment, furniture, and any necessary repairs and maintenance, as well as bar and kitchen supplies. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  In conclusion, the Fifth Circuit stated that “in light of the plain language of section 33… Congress has spoken unambiguously and so as to leave no room for embroidery. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]