Search for: "Little v State" Results 2101 - 2120 of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by MARK GREAVES, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Williams v The Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme and another [2018] UKSC 65 was handed down on 17 Dec 2018. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
At Tuesday's oral argument in Forest Grove School District v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
  You can read a little more about the facts in the case in the news story you can find here. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:09 pm
Earlier this month, Apple offered Proview a settlement (supposedly $16 million), which Proview said is too little. [read post]
17 May 2006, 11:05 am
I am a little late with this post (seeing my sporadic blogging these weeks you might guess what my time schedule looks like), but I wanted to comment on the 20th ratification of the Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980 Convention) of 28 November 2003.With this ratification made on May 12th the protocol, which was concluded by 91 states parties to the Conventional Weapons Convention in 2003, reached its quorum and will enter into force in 6 month… [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act - Funding)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of: S.E. and B.E. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act - Funding)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of: S.E. and B.E. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am by Mark Rienzi
A narrow ruling would dispose of this case but provide little guidance for pregnancy-counseling-regulation cases pending in the lower courts. [read post]