Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Privacy In a prediction at the end of 2012 for BNA I said that 2013 might be the year in which the privacy industry remembered that the state is more threatening than a cookie. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
”It is a striking feature of the scheme – and lies at the heart of this application – that the cap applies equally to a childless couple in an area with cheap and plentiful social housing as it does to a lone parent mother of several children in inner London compelled to rent on the private market. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
”It is a striking feature of the scheme – and lies at the heart of this application – that the cap applies equally to a childless couple in an area with cheap and plentiful social housing as it does to a lone parent mother of several children in inner London compelled to rent on the private market. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
Wainer filed for divorce in the Principal Registry of the Family Division, London, England (the "London Action"). [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm
The decision stands at odds from a ruling from a federal judge in Washington D.C.The case is A.C.L.U. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Shah v Croydon LBC [2013] EWHC 3657 (Admin) [Not on Bailii yet. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London (arguing state law, rather than federal common law, should supply the definition of “arbitration” in the Federal Arbitration Act, so to minimize FAA displacement of traditional State authority over contract law). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:52 pm
Ruspoli knew or believed that the Statue was owned by .the Kingdom of Cambodia or knowingly provided false or misleading provenance information about the Statue;Legal observers of the case, docketed as United States Of America v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am
This did not extend to a right of access to information held by the State when the State was not willing to provide it. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
But New London Mayor Justin Finizio, who previously apologized for the original Kelo condemnations, has proposed devoting the property for a true public use: The 2005 Supreme Court decision in New London v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
New London, many states, including Pennsylvania, responded by tightening their eminent domain laws. [read post]
