Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 2101 - 2120 of 5,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2016, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
A subsequent settlement proposal from the plaintiff sharply decreased the cash amount but asked for a non-compete-like provision the court says would be void per California B&P 16600. [read post]
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: innovation often goes along w/having to take a license b/c of patent threats. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In many cases you can say that you just don’t have copyright over the matter claimed.Ramsey: interacts w/remedy: suppose P is trying to cover facts; is entire copyright invalid? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If it’s b/c they go too close to other areas like patent, then alternatives might matter. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Does the P have to rebut the defense or does the D have to prove the four factors? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:21 am by Brian Toth
“Summary judgment is appropriate only if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm by Jon Sands
  Fed R Crim P 35(b) allows a sentence reduction. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
[P]roof can be made only by some other person, who was a witness of its execution, and at the same time subscribed his name to the conveyance as a witness. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
[P]roof can be made only by some other person, who was a witness of its execution, and at the same time subscribed his name to the conveyance as a witness. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 1400(b) provides that a corporate defendant in a patent case—like corporate defendants in nearly all other types of cases—may be sued in any district in which personal jurisdiction lies. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Relief in equity was not viewed as a matter of right but was deemed as subject to the discretion of the court. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Hence, whether a carrier runs the risk of becoming obligated under any of these circumstances is a matter entirely within its control. [read post]