Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 3,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2014, 6:01 pm
Of course, the applicant may desire to emphasize and fully describe those arguments which he or she feels were or might be persuasive to the examiner; (F) a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed; (G) if appropriate, the general results or outcome of the interview; and (H) in the case of an interview via electronic mail a paper copy of the contents exchanged over the internet MUST be made and placed in the patent application file as required by the… [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:52 am
THE NOTICE AND ITS IMMEDIATE IMPLICATIONS Notice is limited in scope As a preliminary matter, it is important to note that the Notice only addresses the US federal income tax consequences of convertible virtual currency transactions and not any other types of virtual currency transactions. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:28 pm
If you don’t itemize your deductions, you may not claim your charitable donations, no matter the amount. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
We'd just met and were feeling each other out. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Intro para Does Unconscious Bias Matter? [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm
The holding period is key – and that’s where the ex-dividend matters. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:48 am
Apart from their similar subject matter, several themes unite the three papers. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:34 pm
However, it’s not a matter of simply marking it as zero and calling it a day. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:42 pm
Filed under: 105(h), Affordable Care Act, Claims Administration, COBRA, Corporate Compliance, Employee Benefits, Employers, ERISA, Fiduciary Responsibility, FMLA, Health Plans, HIPAA, Human Resources, I-9, Immigration, Insurance, Internal Controls, Medicare Part D, Mental Health, Mental Health Parity, Prescription Drugs, Uncategorized Tagged: ACA, Bankruptcy, defense of marriage act, distressed plans, DOMA, Employee Benefits, Employers, expatriate plans, Fiduciary Responsibility,… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:39 pm
Filed under: 105(h), Affordable Care Act, Claims Administration, COBRA, Corporate Compliance, Employee Benefits, Employers, ERISA, Fiduciary Responsibility, FMLA, Health Plans, HIPAA, Human Resources, I-9, Immigration, Insurance, Internal Controls, Medicare Part D, Mental Health, Mental Health Parity, Prescription Drugs, Uncategorized Tagged: ACA, Bankruptcy, distressed plans, Employee Benefits, Employers, expatriate plans, Fiduciary Responsibility, Health Plans, International [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 12:47 pm
The summary of the Bill describes the proposed amendments as follows: This enactment amends the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act to, among other things, (a) specify the elements of valid consent for the collection, use or disclosure of personal information; (b) permit the disclosure of personal information without the knowledge or consent of an individual for the purposes of (i) identifying an injured, ill or deceased individual and communicating with their next… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Vesting is super important: if you don’t get there, none of the other stuff matters. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
d. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
. ________________________________________________________________________ DEED Prepared by: (print signer’s name below signature) _________________________________________ BRIAN D. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
District Judge John D. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:25 pm
No matter whether you report or your employer reports, make sure you include all tip income. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
For instance, for purposes of the eligibility non-discrimination rule of Code section 105(h), the Code specifies that an employer can disregard employees who are nonresident aliens and who receive no earned income (within the meaning of section 911(d)92) from the employer which constitutes income from sources within the United States within the meaning of section 861(a)(3). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Second, the department’s analysis of the spineflower mitigation measures was legally impermissible because there was no substantial evidence that the mitigation matters were adequate. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The same concerns might also lead to leaving a hold in place, instead of rethinking matters, when different litigation comes along.We fully appreciate the heads-you-win, tails-I-lose position in which attorneys drafting litigation holds find themselves: Define their preservation terms too narrowly and our side risks being second-guessed down the road for “under-preserving” or, worse yet, spoliation. [read post]
