Search for: "National Whistleblowers Center"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 5:20 am
Members have played a leading role criticizing voting machines in other nations. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The National Whistleblowers Center has released a report on the Impact of Qui Tam Laws on Internal Corporate Compliance. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 4:43 pm
Don't Call Me, I'll Call You - Bell Canada Pays $1.5 Million for Unauthorized Telecommunications Practices - Vancouver lawyer Laura Bevan of Lawson Lundell on the firm's Western Canada Business Litigation Blog NWC Report Proves that Qui Tam Statutes Have "No Negative Impact" on Compliance Programs - Lindsey Williams of the National Whistleblower Center on their Whistleblowers Protection Blog LLC Membership Interests as… [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
The National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) publicly released its report to the Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Impact of Qui Tam Laws on Internal Compliance. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
When the Senate passed its flawed version of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA), S. 372, and the National Whistleblowers Center called on the House to fix the flaws, Capt. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:06 am
What I read clearly confirmed the findings of attorneys at the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) as reported in their public statement "S. 372: A Bad Deal for Whistleblowers. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:06 am
Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center, wrote a history lesson published today by England's Guardian. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center (NWC) received a letter from whistleblowers concerning our position on the Senate version of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 372). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:36 am
Jane Turner Dear Whistleblower Community: The National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) has received your letter. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:28 am
Lindsey Williams, Advocacy Director of the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC), received the “Restore Integrity Award” from Popular, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:59 am
The NWC, along with the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition and the Federal Ethics Center had previously issued a statement calling S. 372 a "bad deal" for whistleblowers. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
Read more from the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) here. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:18 am
Dean Zerbe is special counsel at the National Whistleblowers Center. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
After a careful review of S. 372, the National Whistleblowers Center, the Federal Ethics Center, and the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition strongly recommend that the bill not be approved in its current form. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:34 pm
It’s becoming one more example of the “center cannot hold;” secrecy provokes wanton revelations, which in turn provoke harder secrecy protections, which provoke ever more energetic efforts to undermine them, ad nauseam. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm
I am not saying (and I do not believe Stalder is saying) that any particular leak is justified (though the work of Global Financial Integrity suggests that illicit financial flows really deserve whistleblowing). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:13 am
Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center, wrote about this section as follows: PROHIBITION AGAINST EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION (CRIMINAL) Section 1107 of H.R. 3763, codified as 18 U.S.C. 1513(e), amends the obstruction of justice statute to clearly prohibit retaliation against employee whistleblowers. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm
After a careful review of S. 372, the National Whistleblowers Center, the Federal Ethics Center, and the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition strongly recommend that the bill not be approved in its current form. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Kohn, Executive Director of the National Whistleblowers Center, for an article released today. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:05 pm
To be sure, one might find it a bit strange that so much of the blog exchanges over L’Affair Assange has centered on the potential liability of the media. [read post]
