Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 2101 - 2120 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2016, 5:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The plurality did not define the precise scope of the parental due process right in the visitation context and stated that the constitutionality of any standard for awarding visitation turns on the specific manner in which that standard is applied. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Adam Klein
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This is not the first time interested parties have used hacking to gain access to private data – the  Rupert Murdoch phone hacking scandal of several years ago was similarly scandalous. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am by Orin Kerr
And cell phone locational data are even less precise in suburban and rural settings. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm by Douglas Cantwell
At a minimum, the risk of states abusing a nebulous standard calls for a precise definition of “unwilling or unable. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
’s argument by outlining the law that applied to the issue and the “standard or review” it used in reviewing the juvenile court judge’s ruling on his motion to suppress. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), and to no longer apply the standard in Frye v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
The question of good-faith performance arises precisely when a party has discretion. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am by Orin Kerr
” The precise reasoning of the opinion is a little murky. [read post]