Search for: "People v Folk"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 5:41 am
Rid your mind of any concept of the Constitution as a democratic document, expressing the political will of the people, as expressed in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:45 pm
I have reason to believe a lot of folks are waiting on that verdict; I've noticed quite a few hits on my own blog by people searching for terms like "tiffany ebay verdict," despite the fact that I mentioned the Tiffany v. eBay case only once, quite briefly, in December. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 2:10 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
See Ferguson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:09 pm
Heller , like Bush v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:53 pm
Excuse me folks, but I couldn't resist pointing out one of the best headlines I've ever seen, the one where Afterdawn.com summed up the MPAA amicus brief in Capitol v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:28 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals [in Republican Party of Minnesota, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 10:44 am
Conn. enclosing a subpoena in Arista v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
When pretrial proceedings end, the Chicago judge must ask the MDL Panel to ship the case back to New York for trial.)Folks -- even folks on the same side of the "v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:42 pm
Since this case will probably be covered by many folks, I will try and get to the legal nerdery, and leave the political stuff for people that care. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:05 pm
"Elrod v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
" The anti-homosexual agenda ALWAYS includes references to "studies" showing that children are harmed by being raised by gay people, but nobody ever actually cites such a study in a reputable academic journal because THEY DON'T EXIST except in the minds of those who refer to them. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:08 pm
Here is another, Stadter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:20 am
Sorry about that folks. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 4:29 pm
" Whatever the use and history, our interest stems from a case recently decided by the Illinois 1st District Appellate Court called Britton v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
v. [read post]
