Search for: "People v James Wells"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
As the confrontation escalates between the House of Representatives and the White House over the production of documents, the appearance of witnesses and compliance with congressional subpoenas, so too have calls for Democrats to initiate impeachment proceedings. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:19 pm
The news that former national security adviser Michael Flynn has reached a cooperation and plea deal with Special Counsel Robert Mueller could not come as less of a surprise. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
This forever changed people’s expectations of the value of an image. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
In describing what I thought the world would be like twenty years hence (i.e., 2012), I said that the “one institution of government in which the people retained faith was the military. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Jonathan James on Family Law blog writes: There is such a thing as common law marriage! [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Plots so inconceivable that even James Bond would be shaken and most definitely stirred. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 10:26 am
Laura Coordes, The Anti-Modification Rules’ Application to Mixed Property: “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is”, 44 Bankruptcy Law Letter 1 (September 2024) Last May, in Lee v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Any perceived conflict of interest, whether well-founded or not, undermines the integrity of the process. ii. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
As it is the inherent human nature that no person ever wants to lose, mediation is the best option for people.[6] The agreement that is arrived upon in mediation is based on the consensus of both parties. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:11 am
Gordon v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Whereas the arrest warrant focuses exclusively on seizing and detaining people, a search warrant can authorize a diverse range of police investigative activities. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
I will pledge to this committee and the American people that I will engage in such an analysis. [read post]
