Search for: "People v. Kennedy"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
Younger v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am
” He cited the decision in Kennedy v The Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20, among others, as demonstrating that the common law is developing alongside Convention rights. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:22 am
Mills v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:18 am
V & VI. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
Perhaps the most egregiously political deviation from precedent since Bush v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
But civil rights groups are also watching another case closely: Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Even Scalia saw, in his dissent in Roper v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:54 pm
United States and Katzenbach v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
At this blog, Professor Steve Vladeck analyzes Elgin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am
The Lopez “revolution” finally petered out with the Court’s 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:22 am
’” FDA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided to consider Timbs v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy are gone, after all. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
(Remember that last year, Mary Kennedy and several members of the Kennedy clan showed up on the last day, with young grandchildren in dress clothes, which was a giveaway of the news that would break that afternoon of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement.) [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
Wygant v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Sega v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
For example, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia voted to uphold a sweeping assertion of federal power in Gonzales v. [read post]
