Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 12,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2012, 4:55 pm
" (See People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:26 am
Stiles v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
Cir. 1970); People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:23 am
After all, people love to pull a straight ticket. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:58 pm
., et al v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 10:15 am
For the order denying the motion to dismiss: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-opinion-and-order-motion-dismiss For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-complaint For more about the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/american-federation-government-employees-v-us-office-personnel-management Contacts Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org Lex Lumina LLP: Managing Partner Rhett Millsaps,… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 2:44 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The second case cited was Shapiro v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Many roads lead to Rome, i.e., API freedom.The Oracle v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Pill LJ disagreed with this line of reasoning: 31. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:25 pm
" Without stopping there, the Court then turned to two earlier cases that applied the "unique circumstances" doctrine to time limits: Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The post Traditionalism Rising, Part V: The Problem of Politics appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
I think that's mostly because 2008 had the moratorium due to Baze v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:09 pm
That changed with the case of U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
The Frye general acceptance test, however, continues to be the standard for determining reliability and admissibility of expert testimony in New York (see People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:19 pm
In last month’s decision in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:16 am
” The facts of McKenna v Singer (decided July 31, 2017) are too dense for meaningful summary and if you want a deep dive then read the forty page Court recitation, but the bottom line was that one of the former pair of entrepreneurs was allowed to take the deal for himself. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 2:42 pm
This proposition was well articulated in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
