Search for: "Philip v. State"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 1:29 pm
"[5] In its recent decision on punitive damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:36 pm
Cleveland AvenueMorrisville, PA 19067 07-1-12 Falcone, Joseph P. 215-741-3501Fax: 215-741-3503 3237 Bristol Road, Suite 100-101Bensalem, PA 19020 07-2-01 Benz, William J. 215-322-0144 Fax: 215-322-7371 60 Township RoadRichboro, PA 18954 07-2-02 Daly, Philip J. 215-343-7961Fax: 215-343-7964 1277 Almshouse RoadWarrington, PA 18976 07-2-03 Baum, Charles W. 215-257-5181Fax: 215-257-5190 705 West Market StreetPerkasie, PA 18944 07-2-05 … [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
Wilson's compensatory award to $18 million and, based on due process concerns and State Farm v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
Philip Morris and our post on Holdgrafer v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:50 am
In Goddard v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks),… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:01 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:58 pm
Williams and State Farm v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
, (EDTexweblog.com), (Patent Prospector), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IPBiz), (Against Monopoly), (Philip Brooks), (IPBiz), Indian government to consider whether to grant compulsory licenses to Natco for the exportation of generic versions of Tarceva and Sutent (Sunitinib) to Nepal : (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (IP Law360), (Spicy IP),GlobalGlobal - GeneralIntellectual privilege or imaginary property? [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
Philip Morris Inc.KINGS COUNTYFamily LawObligation to Pay Accrued Child Support Arrears Survives Death of Custodial Parent; Amount SetDembitzer v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
Philip Morris (2007) ___ US ___ [127 S.Ct. at p. 1062].)Thus, there is a strong argument that since enforcing an arbitration award involves state action, subjecting it to due process review, arbitration awards of punitive damages should be evaluated the same way any other punitive damage award awarded during a trial would be. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
Supreme Court's opinion last year in Philip Morris v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:15 am
Supreme Court granted cert., vacated the lower court decision, and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Philip Morris v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
The case was Philip Morris USA, et al., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:02 pm
Anthony Sebok has an article on FindLaw which analyzes the Oregon Supreme Court's recent opinion in Philip Morris v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 5:22 pm
As Bashman notes, the Oregon court held that the trial court properly refused Philip Morris's proposed punitive damages instruction, even though it correctly stated that the jury should not punish for harm to nonparties, because it also included some language that was erroneous under Oregon state law. [read post]
