Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 2101 - 2120 of 14,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
However, some responsibility for the current state of affairs doubtless rests with the legal regulator itself, who has failed over successive generations to ensure that its licensees possess even baseline levels of technological competence (with some licensees ultimately progressing to the Judiciary or into senior decision-making roles at the Ministry of the Attorney General). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:36 pm by Amy Howe
Led by Illinois, 17 states with Democratic attorneys general and the District tell the court that they “welcome immigrants into the communities because immigrants contribute to their economies and their civic life. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Codifying nationwide federal case law on the subject, in Thomson-CSF, S.A. v Am. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 6:14 pm by Russell Knight
Did you even know what an offer of proof was before reading this article? [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 10:18 am by Michael Heise
While legal formalists may generally defer to clear legal rules, others respond in different ways. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am by Robert Liles
Most notably, regulations issued by the Attorney General require that for a controlled substance prescription to be lawful, it “must be issued for a legitimate medical purpose” by an individual practitioner acting in the “usua [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:52 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court in  Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:25 am by Michael DelSignore
Continue Reading › The post Can an Attorney Represent both Co-defendants without having a conflict of interest? [read post]
District Court Judge James Boasberg’s dismissal of various States Attorneys General’s antitrust case brought against Facebook (now, Meta Platforms). [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487(1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487(2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838). [read post]