Search for: "STATE v MILLER"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 5,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am
The Supreme Court reports that – The Supreme Court has now received formal notification of the Government’s intention to appeal the High Court’s decision of 3 November in the above matter. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 2:02 am
A short case comment on R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union & Ors [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin), which will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
Centre Lane v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
Centre Lane v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
Centre Lane v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:22 am
” Citing to New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
These various proceedings were joined and heard together as Santos & Miller v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 6:00 pm
LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:00 pm
The full judgment can be found here. [1] R(Miller and others) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin) [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
Miller, 179 Wn. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 2016 EWHC 2768 (Admin) see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2016/2768.pdf A spokesperson from the Crown – or UK gov’t – or the Tory party, pick your poison, announced, as one might expect, that the decision will be appealed. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:21 am
The Court considered the sovereignty of Parliament to be critical, and stated the Crown is not entitled to change domestic law through exercise of its prerogative powers. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:15 am
The court reached that decision in Miller v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am
Previously Participated as Counsel for the State Article 30.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and Article V, Section 11, of the Texas Constitution both require the disqualification of a judge “who has previously participated as counsel for the State in a pending matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
In Montgomery, the justices ruled that their 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:08 am
State, 901 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. [read post]
