Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 2101 - 2120 of 4,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 6:46 am by Jordan Steiker
United States it had granted relief when the trial judge had drawn an adverse inference as to a contested fact based on the defendant’s silence at sentencing. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am by Jeff Gamso
United States (which I've written about before) and you can read the opinions here. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by SHG
United States, but the case is all about Amy. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
United States, concerning the limits of restitution victims of child pornography may seek under 18 U.S.C. section 2259. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, admitting its "approach is not without difficulties. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
  (Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the case, presumably because she was involved in it when she was the Solicitor General of the United States.) [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm by Michael Lowe
Back in January, we warned about what happened today: the United States Supreme Court has okayed police pulling people over to search their vehicles based upon an anonymous tip in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
The Court left this issue open in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 12:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
” He added: “There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by Lyle Denniston
  It is immune except as to commercial activity in the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am by Kristen Fries
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]