Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 2101 - 2120 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am by Susan Brenner
And if a grand jury does return an indictment, it then becomes the role of the courts to decide the sufficiency of the indictment, see., e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Across the interbellum era, Americans not only debated the Constitution, laid down vital precedents, and helped fashion the framework of constitutional law; they not only claimed that the Constitution carried certain meanings or led to certain results on federal power, state police power, Cherokee autonomy, or the fate of slavery; in a broader sense, they confronted the problem of constitutional inheritance itself. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
  The elements of the "malfunction" exception to the ordinary burdens of proof in strict liability should be clearly stated and strictly construed by courts. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:37 am by Administrator
The Abdullah Khadr case demonstrates that extradition from Canada will not be dominated by concerns about comity towards states requesting extradition. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:21 pm
Every notarization shall include the date upon which the notarial act was performed, and the county or city and state in which it was performed.B. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am by Frank Cranmer
The court held that the display violated the separation of church and state and gave the municipality six months to remove it. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
Sharp disagreement over policy gives voters a clear, easily understandable choice. [read post]