Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 8,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2007, 1:23 am
City of New York BRONX COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Granted Motion to Reargue; Court Adheres to Prior Decision Denying Vacatur People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:17 am
Chan WESTCHESTER COUNTYConsumer ProtectionPurchaser of Used Car Warranty Referencing Out-of-Business Insurer Recovers in Small Claims Goldsberry v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeCourt Finds Weight of Authority, Language of §30.30, Policy Considerations Support Partial Conversion People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
Foy KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant's Jail Term Does Not Exceed 90 Days; Defendant Not Entitled to Pre-Sentence Report People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:26 am
The statute and policy target enterprises who overcharge large numbers of ordinary people small amounts, then insulate themselves from liability using non-negotiable contracts preventing the small stakes from being accumulated to make a case worth pursuing. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
Tiny or frivolous claims are still not likely, given that litigation costs in most Member States are much higher, and litigation over small amounts simply does not pay off for plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The case of Fisher v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am
(Note there is some oversimplification below; for instance, the rules are different when the defender is actually the initial aggressor, for instance if D attacks V, V fights back, and then D kills V in “self-defense. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
Settlement of Viacom v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:25 pm
Cause if you do, you're just askin' to get nicked.And that's what happened to Lashawn Jackson in the case of People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:02 pm
Novak v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
Yes--In fact, there already is a small, lump sum death benefit as part of Social Security. 3. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:49 am
Concepcion and American Express v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:50 am
Related Cases: Garfum v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:38 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
He dreamed of a time when people would be judged "not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:54 am
I blogged a couple of days ago about the important case of R v Rogers, 2016 ONSC 70 (Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Ontario court provides clear guidance on privacy and "tower dumps" in R v Rogers and Telus). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
We do not live in a society where all the people share uniform religious beliefs. [read post]
