Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Dodd, Victoria J.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010.Election LawKF4886 .K37 2010Campaign rules : a 50-state guide to campaigns and elections in America / Nina Kasniunas and Daniel M. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:58 pm
¶21 (quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Fla.), and United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 2:45 pm
National litigated a $171.04 bill all the way up to the North Carolina Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
The United States is the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have a law requiring paid vacation. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
It kills us to have to phone it in, since this week features one of the most attention-grabbing cases of a lackluster term, simultaneously implicating both the North Carolina transgender bathroom law and the most important administrative law question in recent memory. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
(g) there is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am
” Defendant’s parent began using its mark in the US as early as 1911, and defendant/those in privity with it used the mark continuously in Canada and the United States, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, the Rockies, Texas, and Louisiana. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
April 12, 2010) (forum defendant rule not resurrected by post-removal service).North Carolina: Chace v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:05 am
In, United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am
United States, which involves an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court, for state-court prosecutions of potential recipients of presidential pardons; in an accompanying essay on his eponymous blog, he discusses the relation between originalism and stare decisis as invoked by Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the Gamble In an op-ed for The New… [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:14 am
Well, we’ve seen it become a topic on the presidential campaign trail and in North Carolina. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
