Search for: "State v House"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 28,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 9:10 am
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
Hearings tomorrow in the House of Representatives on PTAB Appointments Clause Issues arising from the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:56 am
City of Lewes v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 8:45 am
Blog posts:Sanctuary Policies, Immigration, and Public Safety (Border Criminologies Blog, Jan. 2021) [text] Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: The Supreme Court’s Muslim Travel Ban Decision (Just Security Blog, Jan. 2021) [text]US: Newly Released Files Show Fast-Track to Deportation (Human Rights Watch, Jan. 2020) [text]Reports:Brief of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:30 am
With great clarity and insight, he offers a new lens through which to understand the history of civil rights in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:37 pm
(Neighbors for Smart Nail v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
That’s why, in Utah v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Many in the housing-quality and building-decarbonization space have been eagerly awaiting this opinion, in the hopes that it would clarify the scope of state and local governments’ authority to regulate local utility infrastructure. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
” Western Surety Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
” Western Surety Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
In the United States. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part Two
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
The appellants’ first alternative, which involves leaving the law as stated in OBG but without a dealing requirement, would dispense with the control mechanism which the House of Lords considered to be both necessary and desirable. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
State v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:00 am
The concept has evolved in response to the 2005 landmark United States Supreme Court ruling in City of New London v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:19 pm
Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
