Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 6,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
John Roberts is sworn in as the 17th Chief Justice of the United States under President George W. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Chief Justice Hughes in the 1932 case Crowell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:53 am
In North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 10:35 pm
As Professor John Monahan has stated, "the question I want to raise is whether evolutionary psychology [a branch of cognitive science] . . . could play the same central role in legal scholarship for the next thirty years that economics has played for the past thirty. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:17 pm
Notoriously, the openings that existed in the United States to bring extraterritorial cases on the basis of the Alien Tort Statute have been largely shut down by the United States Supreme Court in Jesner v Arab Bank PLC in 2018. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
United States, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 5:26 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:26 am
Consider Justice Antonin Scalia's words in dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:16 am
H v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:30 pm
-V. to be the legal mother of a child born on May 1, 2009, to the plaintiff N.N. and declaring article 8 of the Domestic Relations Law and Family Court Act §§ 517 and 542 unconstitutional and void and, upon such declaration, directing the defendant to amend the child’s birth certificate, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, entered January 21, 2010, in Nassau County, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
Case Name: Board of Professional Responsibility v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
The post discusses a Connecticut District Court case, Charles v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
The case is US v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:46 am
The ruling in Patel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm
"The Fourth Circuit noted, "The Guild correctly stresses that, under the CPIA, the executive branch can only impose restrictions on archaeological or ethnological material that was first discovered within the State Party that requested the restrictions, i.e., the State Party’s cultural patrimony. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:51 am
In Bush v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
In effect, the self help rule (which does not apply in Quebec) states that as long as trespass does not occur when pruning back roots or branches, even if that work then damages the tree, there can be no valid claim for the damage resulting. [read post]
