Search for: "State v. Force" Results 2101 - 2120 of 32,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
  Like the previous case addressing conflicts between state and federal bank regulators, Watters v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:10 am
The study of pro se defendants (post earlier today) reminds me of a recent Washington case where the defendant who chose to represent himself lost on appeal, forced to live with the consequences of his waiver of counsel: State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am by Eugene Volokh
” In nearly all states, using deadly force merely to prevent theft or to recapture stolen property is generally not allowed (though using nondeadly force is). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:08 pm by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
The arguments against forcing the producers of all reports relied upon to testify would almost seem to necessitate a change in the confrontation clause jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Anderson
In its Charter incarnation, the prohibition of the use of force is situated in a strictly inter-State context, and does not speak to the phenomenon of uses of force by Non-State Actors (‘NSAs’). [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
The Act enabled Lloyd's to force the defendants in Society of Lloyd's v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Justice Myers in Sabey v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am by Benson Varghese
At least 15 states along with the District of Columbia maintain their bans, which will likely remain in force. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am by Benson Varghese
At least 15 states along with the District of Columbia maintain their bans, which will likely remain in force. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am by Benson Varghese
At least 15 states along with the District of Columbia maintain their bans, which will likely remain in force. [read post]