Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The case of R. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Liam Thornton
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court decision, HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department the question that arose was whether a person had to be ‘discrete’ in relation to their sexuality so as to avoid persecution by the state. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:14 am by Cyberleagle
For example, in Herbai v Hungary the Strasbourg Court held that the state had a positive obligation under Article 10 to secure an employee’s right of freedom of expression as against their private sector employer. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 7:06 am by Legal Beagle
Lord Woolman is the presiding judge in the present claim of  M.Wilson v North Lanarkshire Council & Others (A1628/01). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
 From the Land of the Glens comes the judgment of the Glennie in the form of Schuh Limited v Shhh... [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am by Frank Cranmer
In answer to a Written Question in the Lords from Lord Pickles as to why the Government has committed to legislating for outdoor religious marriages outside of wholesale reform of marriage law [HL4172], Lord Bellamy, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at MoJ, replied as follows: “As part of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic, in which the circumstances were exceptional, the Government accelerated legislation to allow outdoor civil weddings and civil… [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:54 am
It’s time to reread Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke [1969] 1 AC 645 (PC) [especially the judgment of Lord Reid] [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For example, in the course of negotiations over the Scotland Act, Lord Sewel stated in the House of Lords that the Westminster Parliament “would not normally legislate with regard to devolved matters in Scotland without the consent of the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:01 pm by MacIsaac
       When this Court adopted the dominant purpose test, it did so in response to a similar move by the House of Lords in Waugh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:24 am by INFORRM
  We have had 425,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
We also received judgments in some eagerly awaited cases including Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) on the issue of prisoner voting following the instant dismissal of the appeal at the end of the hearing in July 2014 to provide an answer before Scottish Referendum took place on the 18 September 2014. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission [2008] ECR I? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
The House of Lords decision in Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v. [read post]