Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
In Jesner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:17 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
[Props to Venkat for doing the main work on blogging this case. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 8:24 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the main opinion in Carey v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
In order to meet statutory and regulatory requirements, California submitted a state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA for its approval. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:35 am
GC & Others v CNIL The first Opinion, and that which is arguably of more general importance, was delivered in GC and Others v CNIL, Case C-136/17 (currently only available in French). [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
In Bridge v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Constitutional/Legal History, but now it is officially out: Race, Sex, and the Freedom to Marry: Loving v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
The main problem with the D.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 6:32 am
ShareMississippi v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:14 am
With commentary at the Lock Law Blog, Ryan Lockman argues that “there is a minimal chance that [the state] will convince Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy and the three remaining conservatives to encroach on state sovereignty in such a fashion, particularly when the main authority on which their argument is based is Bush v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:09 am
What distinguishes this case, Bailey v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
John Doe #1 et al. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:37 am
The main issue in the dispute is whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable where the terms of a contract state that one party is allowed to collect attorney’s fees following a breach, but the other is not. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:57 am
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlO’Brien v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
Ed argued (among other things) that SORNA did not apply to his client, who had been convicted of state sex offenses in 1995, released in 2005, and indicted for failing to register under SORNA on Nov. 26, 2006. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 12:42 pm
The case, Curling v. [read post]
