Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts of the week: Trade Secret and Covenant Not to Compete Posts, Cases and Articles: In the latest high profile battle over which state's law should apply (i.e., California v. every other state), sports agent Aaron Mintz is battling his former employer Priority Sports & Entertainment over the enforceability of his non-compete. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Supreme Beef Processors, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:42 am
In Core v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:40 am
It compared the situation to California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
See Franks v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:27 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Cooper maintained (and continues to maintain) that his blood was planted on the t-shirt. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 7:33 am
Obesity Research Institute, LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Quoting Uphold Our Heritage v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:15 am
Kisano Trade & Invest Ltd. v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 7:39 pm
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:12 am
New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:53 am
New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
