Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 2101 - 2120 of 7,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
  The new law is a win for whistleblowers and is also a win for the IRS in its efforts to go after big time tax cheats,” Stephen Kohn of the qui tam law firm of Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto stated. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Webster v Forest Hills Care Ctr., LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 06289 [2d Dept Sept. 26, 2018]), was an appeal of a decision by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Hugh Stephens Blog has a post entitled FairPlay Canada, the CRTC and OpenMedia: Who Got the “Big Win” on Pirate Site-Blocking? [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
– Hugh Stephens Blog https://t.co/eriScnVAd5 2018-10-22 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-10-22 https://t.co/0DSwV9i0OT 2018-10-23 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-10-22 https://t.co/lRhFnagtJZ 2018-10-23 Emailing link to a work can be making it available for copyright purposes Reformation v Cruiseco [2018] EWHC 2761 https://t.co/6p0XejPk0e 2018-10-23 Eleventh Circuit Rules Official Code of Georgia Annotated is Uncopyrightable https://t.co/vRJ90xsAd4… [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 5:53 am by Anushka Limaye
Stephanie Zable analyzed the Supreme Court ruling in Dimaya v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting opinion from a Georgia Court of Appeals chief judge Stephen Dillard.Whether states may ban home-schooling is a surprisingly complex question. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:17 am by SHG
But then Michelle Goldberg entered the arena and made Stephen Elliot smell less nasty. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]